AuleIntelligence
Private by design Stored on this device
Prove release · risk transfer evidence

The agent has permission. Who owns the loss?

Map authorized-agent failure scenarios to controls, contracts, and insurance evidence. Leave with a broker-ready question pack, a responsibility matrix, and a leadership decision memo.

No policy language is uploaded. Nothing is submitted unless you choose to request a review.
Step one

Name the exposure in business terms.

Describe one agent and the real action it can take. Use approved boundaries, not hoped-for behavior.

Important: The dollar amounts are planning estimates. This tool does not interpret policy language, determine coverage, or replace advice from a licensed broker or counsel.
Saved on this device
Research basis, operating assumptions, and citations

Emerging coverage question. Reuters reported on August 27, 2026 that cyber insurers are reviewing policy language for autonomous-agent losses, including cases in which an agent uses access a company intentionally granted. The article describes an evolving market, not a general exclusion or coverage rule. Reuters.

Risk spans policy lines. Aon says AI exposure can overlap cyber, professional liability, crime, employment, intellectual property, product liability, and directors and officers coverage. It recommends mapping AI use, reviewing whether existing programs remain fit for purpose, and documenting governance and testing. Aon is an insurance broker and its statements are market guidance, not a determination of coverage. Aon, 2026.

Performance failure can differ from attack. Munich Re describes AI performance failures without malicious attacks as a risk layer beyond traditional cyber threats and offers specialized AI performance products. Product availability and fit vary. Munich Re aiSure.

Incident reports need specific facts. On September 7, 2026, a European Commission spokesperson said an incident report should be precise and accurate about measures taken, not treated as a tick-box exercise. Reuters reported this after OpenAI submitted a report concerning the German wiki incident. The article does not establish a universal reporting template or legal duty for every organization. Reuters, September 7, 2026.

The disclosure standard is still developing. OpenAI said on September 5 that its misalignment disclosure practices need to expand and that the industry lacks a clear standard across training, evaluation, and deployment. This is OpenAI's statement about the reported wiki incident, not an independent finding about prevalence. Reuters, September 5, 2026.

A safety stop is not a rollback. OpenAI says monitoring for covered Astra conversations is asynchronous, so an external action may have completed before a stop. A stop does not undo earlier actions, stopped API conversations generally cannot resume, and blind automatic retries should be avoided. The coverage and behavior of this control are product-specific and can change. OpenAI API guidance.

Aule method. The evidence lane, scenario set, release blockers, responsibility map, incident checklist, reconstruction score, and disclosure draft are Aule Intelligence operating standards. They are not insurance, legal, regulatory, or claims advice. Policy wording, contracts, jurisdiction, facts, exclusions, limits, deductibles, notice duties, and carrier decisions control actual coverage.